500 and eighty-about three participants was in fact hired off a large university during the Hong kong because of advertisements posted for the university and you may halls, mass characters using divisions and you can attributes, and snowballing. Evaluation occurred when you look at the a laboratory. Participants accomplished the new gender salience size, the newest mixed-sex anxiety size and you can reported their group history. Most of the tips was in fact showed in their completely new English language as the English ‘s the typical out-of training to own tertiary degree into the Hong kong. This study are carried out in accordance towards the guidance and you can recognition of your own College or university of Hong-kong Person Browse Ethics Panel (HKU HREC). Most of the victims provided created informed consent according to the Report of Helsinki. Parental concur was not necessary for the brand new HKU HREC for this test.
School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).
Dining table 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.
b 1 = no education/pre-primary, dos = primary, step three = junior additional, cuatro = older additional, 5 = post-secondary, six = postgraduate.
c 0 = most other gender only, step one = other intercourse primarily, 2 = almost every other intercourse somewhat more, 3 = one another sex equally, cuatro = same intercourse considerably more, 5 = same sex generally, six = same sex only.
d Parameters contained in this desk had been included because the covariates in every analyses, apart from standard societal stress that has been integrated due to the fact a covariate merely within the analyses of combined-intercourse stress to your college or university decide to try.
Intercourse salience level
Intercourse salience was measured because of the exact same strategy utilized in Data step one. The latest inter-rater accuracy are good for most of the answers (? ranging from .87 to help you .99).
Percentage of most other-intercourse close friends size
Part of almost every other-intercourse best friends try measured by the exact same method included in Research step 1. Part of other-sex loved ones wasn’t analyzed regarding the college take to.
Mixed-intercourse nervousness measure
Like in Data step one, users advertised their blended-sex stress to the altered matchmaking anxiety level (DAS-A) . Compared with Studies 1, members in the Study 2 completed a complete 21-goods types of DAS-An in that relationship feel is actually prominent on school sample (93.4% of one’s people stated a world dating feel; look for listing of dating feel factors from the Dating Records Survey from inside the Desk D inside the S1 File). People that got never ever dated ahead of was basically questioned to assume how they’d getting and you can function on discussed points. For it full-scale, 10 affairs measured Fear of Bad Testing, seven circumstances measured Societal Stress when you look at the Relationship Situations, four points mentioned Personal Stress in the Combined-gender Teams, and you will four filler affairs provided a break out-of rating stress-associated items. The internal surface try good for complete DAS-An excellent (? = .95), Fear of Bad Comparison (? = .92), Social Worry inside the Dating (? = .89), and you can Social Stress in the Combined-gender Teams (? = .80). Since the our very own desire was not just into the relationship nervousness and only 2.6% of your own school users advertised that have zero heterosexual attraction after all, we provided the members on the investigation regarding mixed-gender stress and you can controlled getting intimate orientation.